Do we have an alternative to personnel economics? Yes, we have one: socio-economics.
This is what economists (in this case Edward Lazear) claim:
“Economists have something new to say about these issues, however, primarily because economics provides a rigorous, and in many cases more straightforward, way to think about these human resources questions than do the more sociological and psychological approaches.” (Lazear, Edward. “personnel economics.” The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Second Edition. Eds. Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume. Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online. Palgrave Macmillan. 16 December 2015 <http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_P000327> doi:10.1057/9780230226203.1275
My paper argues that personnel economics is still based on wrong assumptions (yes, I know, that some theorists might say, that this is not a problem. The so-called “as-if” approach is seems to be still alive in economics, probably the only scientific discipline where this thinking is viewed as acceptable), … Mehr lesen...